I just brought my third one of these:
(my first got lost at an event a few years ago, and I lost the USB dongle for my 2nd a few months ago)
If you want something to change your PowerPoint (or powerpoint-like) slides, this is the tool to get. Its worked with every computer I've tried it on, and every piece of presentation software (PDF viewers and HTML slidy in addition to PowerPoint and Open Office).
No software to install either - the dongle appears as a USB keyboard - the four keys send PgUp and PgDown to change slides; the laser beam button sends an F5 (which is start-presentation in PowerPoint) and the bottom button sends 'b' (which is blank screen in PowerPoint).
27 February, 2010
binary numeric promotion in java numeric types
I've been working on a Java backend for stupid, a crypto algorithm language proposed by Ben Laurie.
This has led me to look at Java numeric types a little more closely (and with a decade more cynicism than last time).
I'd forgotten entirely that there were
If
If
If
Likewise
This is specified in 5.6.2 Binary Numeric Promotion of the Java language specification.
(later:)
Its pointed out that C also does implicit casting of smaller types to
This has led me to look at Java numeric types a little more closely (and with a decade more cynicism than last time).
I'd forgotten entirely that there were
short
and long
numeric types - for pretty much any use I've made of numbers in Java ever, int
has been fine.short
behaves a little surprisingly:If
a
and b
are both long
, then a & b
is a long
.If
a
and b
are both int
, then a & b
is an int
.If
a
and b
are both short
, then a & b
is an ... int
. wtf. why?Likewise
byte & byte
-> int
.This is specified in 5.6.2 Binary Numeric Promotion of the Java language specification.
(later:)
Its pointed out that C also does implicit casting of smaller types to
int
; but gcc is a little gentler with its warnings. a+b
gives a warning (not an error) similar to the Java code above, but a&b
does not (presumably because it knows that this can't make the number be any bigger than the types you started out with... something that gets lost in the Java type checking)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)